Abortion: Two Sides of the Argument Essay

In todays society every period a person turns on the television, goes on a computer, turns on a radio, passes a billboard, or picks up a newspaper that person is bombarded with debates. at that place atomic number 18 many different debates and each debate with two parties two of which hurt two very different and sometimes conversational opinions. everyplace a person looks they ar faced with arguments much(prenominal)(prenominal) as hot seat Obamas afford able health care act, gay rights, the matters of the death penalty universe legalized or illegalized in all states, and many more. In this paper I provide non talk most any of the previously tell arguments.I will however talk about mavin of the approximately heated and controversial arguments of today. Before I continue with the debate I fork out chosen I am stating that I will not be sharing any of my personal opinions or views on the matter. I have chosen to discuss the debate regarding stillbirth and the two faces of the argument. I will explain both pro life annals and master filling and the fallacy both sides use when trying to gain followers. Just about every person has an opinion or a side when it comes to the paper of stillbirth. I have researched portionages based on throng who are professional person Life vs. professional woof and if miscarriage is ever Justified.A crownwork make by Gallup in May of 2013 helps to set up some per centumages on what side or sides the American people are taking. Based on a one hundred percent model forty tailfin percent of people are pro prize, forty eight percent are Pro Life, three percent were mixed, 2 three percent did not understand the meaning of the terms provided, and two percent had no opinion. In the poll a majority of the people who participated had chosen which side of the argument they had agreed with. In another recent model done in May 2013 by Gallup shows the percentages of peoples views on if spontaneous miscarriage ho uld ever be legal and Justifiable.Legal under any mass has a vote of twenty six percent, legal under trustworthy muckle fifty two percent, illegal in all circumstances twenty percent, and no opinion had two percent. Pro Life is a Christian based non- profit anti- spontaneous miscarriage face that was founded in the course 1980 by Joseph Scheidler with the musical arrangements head quarters in Chicago Illinois. The goal of the fundamental law is to protect and save unborn children and their mothers with non violent protests. The organization believes that women are world exploited by the spontaneous abortion industry. besides that the abortion industry is the of import cause of what the organization believes is the murder of an benevolent being. The members of Pro Life have many different tactics implemented to publically protest abortion. The Pro Life organization does not condone any violence in the protesting of abortion, but the organization does use lifelikeal mat erial in the flavor the Truth Public Education Initiative. This educational initiative uses graphic pictures of real aborted fetuses to show the aftermath of the procedure. This protest is described as to show our fellow Americans the ugly truth about abortion.The Pro Life members line the major road ways and intersection while showcasing the graphic images. Pro Life organization also uses less graphic forms of protesting such as sidewalk counseling, youth outreach projects, public, protest, 3 presence at abortion clinics, and confronting abortionists. The majority of protesting takes place at the abortion clinics. Pro Life members will stand outside of the clinics to perform prayer vigils, last minute consulting to women and couples with abortion alternatives, pregnancy resources, as well as confidential counseling. Pro Choice I organized by the National Abortion Federation.It is the national sleeper for professional abortion providers. The N. A. F provides training and services to qualified abortion providers in North America. The goal of the N. A. F is to ensure womens prophylactic when to comes to abortion whether it is elective or medically necessary. Pro Choice is focus on around that women should be able to make private medical decisions with their healthcare providers and to have the right to chose what happens to their bodies. The N. A. F also supports the education for women and youth n different contraceptive methods to help prevent unplanned pregnancies.Also the organization provides resources for women to make inform decisions when it comes to their choices. The organization helps to provide women with the education about abortion, adoption, and parenthood. The organization sets quality standards for abortion care and to make sure the medical providers such as Nurses, Physician Assists, Doctors, and Mid wives are qualified to provide noble quality care. N. A. F also helps with legal legislations to persist abortion legal. The organization fear s what ould happen to women if abortion was to made illegal.Pro choice does protest to keep abortion legal in the United States. The Pro Choice advertisements are not as graphic as Pro Lifes. though Pro Choice does have advertisements of what environments women may find themselves in if abortion were to be made illegal. Pro Life also uses education to learn women about what had happened in the 1950s to the 1960s before 4 abortion was legal in America. This is used to create awareness so that history will not repeat itself. According to Our Bodies Ourselves a Pro Choice website uses statics o show mortality rate in women to either seek to perform a self initiated abortion.Between 1950 and 1960 before women were legal able to get an abortion 1. 2 million of those women did self performed abortions. In countries where abortion is still illegal unsafe abortion is the leading cause of parental deaths. This accounts to 219 women dying daily worldwide. Both organizations use medical fac ts and statics for a enceinte part of their demonstrations, however they both employ of use of a tenacious fallacy to make their cases. The logical fallacy that Pro Life and Pro Choice both use is hail to emotion. Appeal to emotion is a fallacy to manipulate the recipients views by using an frantic trigger.This means that the parties touch may not be using literal valid intormation to yield a person. It is very clear botn ot the organizations are against the other. The names are the setoff thing I had noticed. The names are completely opposite from one another. For usage is a person is Pro choice then they are against life or that person is for death or murder. Also if a person is Pro Life then that implies that person is anti-choice. For another example Pro Life members eb advertisement and That I have personally seen tearaway(a) on 95 is a image of a baby with the dictum Endangered species. Obviously children are not a endangered species because human beings are not end angered. This is used to evoke a strong emotional response to gain Pro Life members and not using actual facts to prove a point. Pro Choice also use the appeal to emotion to gain members as well. In a advertisement for the Pro Choice Public Education Project it contains a picture of a dirty bathroom thats covered in filth. Above what is the vat is a plaque that says Operating room. A bathroom is not an operating room this once again used to invoke emotion. The 5 emotions of despair and fear.This is used in the campaign for keeping abortion legal. Also someone the slogans each side uses appeal to emotions a well. For example Pro Life slogan You might forgive yourself, but a suddenly baby sure cant. Whether the baby to speak of is baseless or alive the said baby does not have the cogency to comprehend forgiveness. Both side also use TV adds to give the axe the other side and to incline the viewers. The internet video 180 shows how to reposition a persons mind about abortion in spite of appearance seconds. The method that was used involved Hitler and his influence on the German people. irradiation Comfort is the interviewer in the movie. Comfort asks a few young people about their feeling regarding the killing of the Jewish people. All the participants agreed that what had happened was ill-timed and that killing a person was wrong. Comfort then moved into abortion after using emotional response to what happened in the holocaust and canvas that to abortion. Comfort put that abortion is Americas holocaust. In cobblers last though both Pro Life and Pro Choice have valid points and information both of the rganizations use appeal to emotion to persuade potential followers.