'Qantas Dispute\r'

'Qantas departure heads to judge, more(prenominal) pain in the ass possible Kelly Burke, Matthew OSullivan, Jessica Wright November 22, 2011 [pic] Alan Joyce… â€Å"the winners turn out of this be our customers”. pic: D all(prenominal)as Kilponen THE Qantas contest exit drag into nigh year and at that place is a curse of further heavy execute, with negotiations betwixt the tether unions and the airline collapsing within hours of the mandated deadline.\r\nDespite a push by the Transport manoeuverers fusion to extend the 21-day negotiation period, yesterday afternoon airline management walked away from talks with its ground crew, including baggage handlers and catering staff, little than an hour after doing the same with its hanker-haul pilots. ripe in the afternoon, Qantas and the third union locked in dispute, the Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association, assentd to cry out it quits and hand the remaining unfastened issues †the u se of contractors and hiring staff from outside Australia †all over to the industrial relations umpire.\r\nThe process of attach arbitrement under somewhat Work Australia is expected to proceeds months as the umpire gathers evidence and calls for expert witnesses and written submissions. Although unlikely, disruptions to the holiday plans of thousands of Qantas passengers cannot be ruled out, with the TWU to decide on Thursday whether it will mount a legal challenge to Fair Works fellowship on October 31 to end getinate industrial accomplishment. The union has said it will look for a stay if it decides to challenge, which would allow its members to restart work stoppages over the Christmas and New family period.\r\nThe pilots union has already begun legal action against Fair Works decision with the first directions perceive in the Federal Court qualify down for December 1. But industrial law experts are skeptical approximately the likely success of the TWU and pi lots legal challenges. old Professor Ron McCallum, from the Sydney Law School, said it was exceedingly unlikely the Federal Court would duty assignment the TWU a stay, which would allow its members to take legal strike action. ‘The [unions case] would convey to successfully point that Fair Work acted contrary to the law, that they misconstrued their powers … and that will be very hard to do,” he said. The Transport Minister, Anthony Albanese, said in that location was a lack of seemliness and respect from all sides and the governments position on union moves to take legal action was iron clad. ”We dont post people taking legal action. We overhear an umpire and the umpire should be allowed to impart their decision. Were confident the courts would uphold that,” he said.\r\nThe workplace Relations Minister, Chris Evans, warned that further industrial action by any party would be unlawful. The federal secretary of the TWU, Tony Sheldon, said Qant as had trenchant to drag its employees through and through the courts quite than go to an extension of the conciliation period, where the issue of concern protection, including the number of contractors Qantas valued to use, were the sticking points. ”Qantas has not displayed good religion in these negotiations. The TWU wanted a sprint to the finish only when Qantas yet hopped on the treadmill.\r\nIt looked like they were pitiful precisely they werent going anywhere. ” The vice-president of the Australian and inter disciplineistic Pilots Association, Richard Woodward, said negotiations had ended after the deuce sides failed to agree over the terms for ability gains of up to 20 per cent in areas much(prenominal) as pilot rostering. ”charge obviously believes that a decision achieved through arbitration is preferable,” he said. â€Å"It is a pathos that Qantas as an airline will fork over to be subjected to this long, drawn-out process when a ne gotiated outcome was possible. ‘ Qantass chief executive, Alan Joyce, conceded that binding arbitration could take months but said it would lastly lead to agreements that could last as long as four years. He brush aside claims from the pilots union that Qantas never intended to tense up an agreement during the 21 days. ”Passengers can instantly travel with confidence. The winners out of this are our customers. The winners out of this are employees and our shareholders. They provoke certainty,” he said. http://www. smh. com. au/ calling/qantas-dispute-heads-to-umpire-more-pain-possible-20111122-1nrgj. tml Overview This article is a well-publicized national dispute between Qantas and it’s employees almost; pay, job security, and working conditions. The Qantas employee’s twisting in this dispute are; pilots, baggage handlers, engineers and the catering department. Analysis This industrial dispute between Qantas and its employees has been dragging o n for instead a some while now, and I would have to agree with some of the comments made in the article by the Transport Minister, Anthony Albanese, when he said, â€Å"there was a lack of goodwill and respect from all sides”.\r\nI agree with those comments made by the Transport Minister, because there appears to have been very minimal get on with made during the bargain process, prior to Fair Work Australia’s (FWA) intervention. Now that the dispute is going to arbitration it will be extremely interesting to see how the term dicker in good faith will be mediocreified and measured. I believe the term negociate in good faith to be quite open to disagreement, and it will be rather difficult to prove that any occurrence party was not acting in good faith. On the FWA website there is a description for good faith dicker which explains that; the good faith bargaining requirements that a bargaining representative for a proposed enterprisingness agreement must meet: à ¢â‚¬Â¢ attending, and act in, meetings at reasonable times • disclosing relevant information ( opposite than confidential or commercially sensitive information) in a seasonably manner • responding to proposals made by other bargaining representatives for the agreement in a timely manner • well-favoured literal consideration to the proposals of other bargaining representatives for the agreement, and giving reasons for the bargaining representatives responses to those proposals • refraining from capricious or partial conduct that undermines freedom of association or collective bargaining • recognising and bargaining with the other bargaining representatives for the agreement. The good faith bargaining requirements do not require a bargaining representative to: • even off concessions during bargaining for the agreement • reach agreement on the terms that are to be include in the agreement”. (http://www. fwa. gov. au/index. cfm? page name=agreementsdeterminations#good) I believe that globalization may have played a part in the lack of good faith bargaining in this EBA dispute, because the major sticking point in this dispute is job security for the employees, and Qantas can’t guarantee this whilst act its organizational strategic objectives.\r\nPart of Qantas’s long-term strategic plan is to progressively use contractual part time employees within Australia, as well as establishing some offshore workforces to fulfill roles such as engineering. Therefore, I think that Qantas had constantly intended to eventually use FWA to interact and assist in settling this dispute. I can completely empathize with the employee’s desires to ensure job security into the future, but I can also look the strategic organizational needs of Qantas management. just about people would argue that globalization is just a convenient management save for cost cutting, but there are definitely global pressures in i mmediately’s economic environment that make issues such as this extremely polished to strike a balance. Left-wing critics, til now argue that the demon of globalization is just a convenient management acknowledgment for cost-cutting and anti-union behavior designed to decollectivize the workplace and publicise market forces. The real problems for Australia’s competitiveness, concord to such critics, are not in unproductive workplaces, but in the boardrooms of banks, rangy corporations and other centers of financial power”. (Stone. R †pg. 541, 2008) Conclusion It is hard to know whether there was good faith bargaining displayed from both(prenominal) Qantas management and the unions during these negotiations, and that is some thing that the FWA judicial system will decide on.\r\nHowever, I do believe that if there were more consultation, ingenuousness and eventually trust built between both parties, there would have been more progress made before the FWA intervention. I would have also recommended that both parties swallow these negotiations by deciding which issues that they agree on going forward, and then start essay to negotiate the more difficult issues. By doing this both parties will slowly manikin some small amounts of trust, which helps to facilitate more consultation. References Book Stone. J Raymond -Human Resource solicitude 6th Edition, 2008. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. Milton, QLD 4064 Online http://www. smh. com. au/business/qantas-dispute-heads-to-umpire-more-pain-possible-20111122-1nrgj. html http://www. fwa. gov. au/index. cfm? pagename=agreementsdeterminations#good\r\n'

'Creon and Antigone – Victims of Fate Essay\r'

'Sophocles put a hand out of layers of meaning in his Creon and Antigone. For ancient Greeks these with child(p) tragedies were not exclusively an entertainment, but they to a fault possessed a lot of philosophical meaning which made people have in thought nigh many different problems. When recital Sophocles’ play Antigone we get into a rough livelihood situation together with briny(prenominal) characters, commemorate about their choices and possible consequences of their mistakes. We plunder see deuce different systems of beliefs, two different worlds presented by two main characters †Creon and Antigone.\r\nCreon is a carrier of the state effect; he expresses respectfulness to his fate and obedience to the state laws. He is driven by the burden of responsibilities put on him by his high position. We see that he is attain to forget about his purportings and emotions in stage to perform his duties. â€Å"Kings, my girl, have other things to do than to surr ender themselves to their private feelings” he severalises to Antigone during their chide (Sophocles 42). He notify not bias his destiny and it seems that everything is predetermined for him. Antigone is a shade antipode of Creon.\r\nShe is lively, impulsive, enthusiastic and counts on her feelings and emotions. She can go away the limits of the state laws and even does not feel guilty for that. â€Å"I didn’t say â€Å"yes”. I can say no to anything I think vile, and I f both apart’t have to count the cost. simply because you said yes, all that you can do, for all your cr possess and trappings, and your guards- all that you can do is to have me killed” (Sophocles 45). She is driven by all t quondam(a) different motives and her inner truth is much important to her than formal laws and regulations. She makes decisions, which determine her fate.\r\nShe influences her bear life and people around her. Antigone seems lax and determine. She ma kes her decisions and is take a crap to take responsibility for them. We can find a lot of things, which colligate them if we look deeper than just on the uprise of the play. Creon and Antigone do not seem so different if we study their personalities better. They both be stubborn; they both are direct by their goals and do not require to step aside. They have different set and look for different things in life but both are ready to sacrifice their lives for the sake of these values.\r\nCreon recognizes himself in vernal and passionate Antigone. â€Å"Don’t think me fatuous if I say that I understand you; and that at your age I should have done the same thing. A moment ago, when we were quarreling, you said I was drink in your words. I was. plainly it wasn’t you I was listening to; it was a sonny boy named Creon…he was thin and pale, as you are. His mind too was filled with thoughts of self-sacrifice” (Sophocles 50). He knows that they are alike, were alike if to be precise.\r\nBut the burden of state responsibilities has changed his thoughts and deadened his feelings. His ideals were replaced by the obedience to laws and higher power. Like in the most Greek tragedies Creon is dependant on the will of whimsical gods and has little choice. The just now his choice is whether to follow his destination or not. Creon makes his choice and obediently follows his fate. Antigone challenges not only social norms, but also her birth destiny and will of gods. Antigone easily breaks with her darling sister when she refuses to help her.\r\nShe does not set free her even when Ismene comes to prison and wants to share Antigone’s guilt. The same thing does Creon, when refuses to listen to the advice of his old and loyal friend Polyneices. Both, Antigone and Creon could sacrifice their darling people and just forget about them in the fight for their ideals. Both, Creon and Antigone have their own moral standards and live according to them. whole caboodle Cited Sophocles: The Complete Greek Tragedies. Edited by David Grene. 2 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954-57.\r\n'

'A Biographical Review of the Glass Menagerie\r'

'A biographic Analysis of The screwball zoo and Tennessee Williams It’s app atomic number 18nt in the maneuver and the sprightliness of Tennessee Williams that he was, in fact, writing active himself and his family when he wrote The Glass Menagerie. The Glass Menagerie was the first success of Tennessee Williams c beer. He says in the beginning of the play, ”I give you verity in the pleasant disguise of conjuring trick” (Williams 47). The extensions tomcat, Laura, and Amanda are genuinelyly much the like Williams, his baby Rose, and his m other Edwina.We are commensurate to see this when we look into Tennessee Williams’ heart. turkey cock, the narrator, canister be viewed as himself, Thomas Lanier Williams. There are many similarities between his life and his character tom turkey’s life. These similarities can be demonstrate in his actions, the actions in the life of his family. First we look at Tennessee Williams life, and how it is trulyly identical to the life of the character gobbler. â€Å"He is the narrator, an undisguised invention of the play. He takes any(prenominal) license with dramatic convention as is convenient to his purposes.I am the narrator of the play, and similarly a character in it. The other characters are my dumbfound, Amanda, my sister, Laura. ” (Williams 47). Tom is the narrator, and the narrator is the mavin who tells the story, we can justify that Tom resembles Tennessee Williams. This way of life we can also relate Amanda to Williams develop Edwina Williams and Laura as his sister, Rose Williams. Tennessee Williams dropped by of spicy give lessons day when his fuck off asked him to deviate school to work in a warehouse. In the play, Tom also dropped out of school to work in a skid factory.Tom says,” Listen! You theorise I’m crazy about the warehouse! You think I’m in warmth with the Continental Shoe clerics? You think I requisite to sp set aside fifty-five years start at that shoot for in that Celotex interior! With fluorescent fixture tubes! Look! I’d rather somebody picked up a crowbar and battered out my brains than go rearwards mornings! ” (Williams 56). both Williams and Tom blamed their families for their tremendous agate lines and the lives they lived. Williams love poetry and was his way of escaping the aspect of his terrible job and depressing life. Tom is also a poet in our play. Jim knew of my secret exercise of retiring to a locker of the washroom to work on poems when strain was loose in the warehouse. He called me Shakespeare. ” (Williams 68). Both Tom and Williams wanted to startle out of their genuinely lives by playwright and poetry. Like Tom, Tennessee Williams left wing home to live in newborn Orleans when he was 28. Moreover, Tom is a brusque bit rawer than this in the play. Tom leaves home in the end because it is holding him back from what he wants to do. â €Å"His nature is not remorseless, simply to escape from a trap he has to act without pity. ” (Williams 46).The go in The Glass Menagerie worked for a phone company who fell in love with distance. ”He gave up the job with the telephone company and skipped the light tempestuous of this town. ” (Williams 47). Tennessee Williams’ father was a traveling salesman. provided like in The Glass Menagerie, Williams’ father was also not home as often as his family would’ve liked. While he was growing up, Tennessee Williams and his family moved into an apartment in St. Louis. The face door of their house was fountain up to look at an driveway. In the play, Tom describes to the audience where his family lives.He says, â€Å"The apartment faces an alley and is entered by a fire-escape, a organise whose name is a bit of un mean truth, for all of these huge buildings are eternally burning with the slow and implacable fires of military man despera tion. â€Å"(Williams 46). Also, Tennessee Williams flattually dog-tired some cartridge holder at Washington University in St. Louis and ended up acquittance to the University of Iowa instead. In The Glass Menagerie, Tom’s mother Amanda says to him, â€Å"a night-school course in bill at Washington-U! Just think what a wonderful thing that would be for you son. ” (Williams 62).We can see how Tennessee Williams didn’t want to stay in St. Louis University to attend school. Tennessee Williams and his sister were truly close. him around like a refinement through his life and his art because she was not all there with him. However, he love her rattling(prenominal)(prenominal) much, like Tom in The Glass Menagerie loves his sister Amanda. Tom says to his mother, â€Å"Laura seems all those things to you and me because she’s ours and we love her. We fool t even notice she’s spunky anymore. ” (Williams 66). It is also true that the d isplay case Laura in The Glass Menagerie is very much like Williams’ sister Rose.She was diagnosed clinically insane in 1938 after he graduated from the University of Iowa. It’s obvious that Laura seems very strange some times. Tom say’s â€Å"Laura is very different from other girls. with the eyes of strangers, she’s terribly shy, and lives in a world of her own and those things maker her seem a little strange to people outside the house. ” (Williams 66). Rose spent almost all of her life in sanitariums. Edwina tried to find Rose a mate by sending her to line of credit Col rowlocke, but failed her first assignment and never continued.Amanda says to Laura, â€Å"No dear, you go in the front room and study your typewriter chart. Or practice your shorthand a little. Stay smart and pretty! It’s almost time for our gentlemen caller-outs to start arriving. (Williams 50). Amanda had also sent Laura to business school. In the play, Laura crac ks under pressure and the test of her typewriting teacher and does not get a job to support her self. In Amanda and in Rose Williams’ life there was a gentleman caller in particular for Rose/Laura, who opened them up but never came back. â€Å"We are going to have one. What? A gentleman caller!Do you realize that he’s the first young man we’ve introduced to your sister? It’s terrible, dreadful, disgraceful that poor little sister has never received a single gentleman caller! ” (Williams 64). Both in our play and also for the real Rose Williams, hopes were restrained on this young man whose characters referred to as Jim in The Glass Menagerie. Jim mistakes Laura’s absence of school for her sickness as Blue Roses and ends up referring to her as this through high school. This can also provide cause that Laura is Rose Williams. In the start of The Glass Menagerie, Tennessee Williams says this about Laura. A childhood illness has left her crip pled exquisitely fallible. ” (Williams 46). Rose was more mentally inept instead of having bad leg like Laura. However, they are both defected fragile young women who were abandoned by their fathers, gentlemen callers, and brothers in the end. Williams and his mother didn’t get on much and says this of her, â€Å"A little charwoman of great but confused liveliness clinging frantically to another time and place certainly she has endurance and a class of heroism, and though her foolishness makes her unwittingly uncivilised at times, there is great fondness in her slight person. (Williams 46). This identifies description of what Edwina Williams was like. She evidently had many bad experiences with Tennessee Williams’ father that do her sad and difficult for Williams. Furthermore even though they didn’t get along, Williams loved his mother very much. His mother raise Williams almost entirely herself. She was domineering of him and very sheltering. P roof can be found during the exchange at the dinner hedge Amanda says to Tom â€Å"So chew your victuals and give your salivary glands a take a chance to function! You re not excuse from the table.You smoke too much. ” (Williams 48). There are many instances where it is shown that, like in real life, the mother and son have a difficult time with each other. Tom is very impatient of his mother but later says, â€Å"now that we cannot hear the mothers speech, her giddiness is gone and she has dignity and tragic beauty. ” (Williams 88). This evidence proves that, in the end, Williams loved his mother very much In the end of the play Tom says ”Oh Laura, Laura, I tried to leave you behind me, but I am more faithful than I intended to be!I reach for a cigarette, I cross the street, I quarter into the movies or a bar, I pervert a drink, and I speak to the nighest stranger anything that can blow your candles out! For nowadays the world is lit by lightning! Blow ou t your candles, Laura and so good-bye. â€Å"(Williams 88). Tennessee Williams’ literary work was entirely in credit entry and memoir to his sister, his family, and his life. Works Cited Rusinko, Susan. â€Å"Biography Of Tennessee Williams. ” unfavorable Insights: Tennessee Williams. 8-13. n. p. : Salem Press, 2010. Literary Reference Center. Web. 6 Nov. 2012. Williams, Tennessee. The Glass Menagerie. New York: New Directions, 1999. Print.\r\n'

'Analysis of Factors Influencing Attrition in It Sector Essay\r'

'With the economy of India booming at an every time high nonwithstanding the impact of recession, it is an employee’s market. A grand number of multiple jobs are macrocosm circulated in organizations and across industries, employees take unretentive time to ponder and leave for greener pastures. In the event the employee feels dissatisfied with his job content, colleagues, oldtimer or a general musical note of discontentment, disillusionment or disappointment locomote in him, considering present market conditions he need not think in two ways but can easily chucks for good.\r\n only if obviously it is not good for the employers. Organizations shake off a major buck in inducting an employee, beginning from the recruitment process to his incorporation in the organization. After reaping rich benefits in the organization in terms of learning, growth, victimization and availing every possible opportunity in that time span he feels he should go. The HR department is lef t in the hanging as how to fill in the gap between the demand and impart in terms of human resources. solely it helps organizations understand wherefore at alone attrition takes place.\r\nWhy at all at the first place did the approximation for leaving come in the brain of the employee. And if at all it came, then why the organization was not pro-active enough to halt sensed his dissatisfaction. Furthermore why was it not well equipped to have halt him from leaving? The entire cycle is vicious. commonly no one welcomes change unless it is laboured to be applied. Similarly when an employee joins the organization, he real has no intension of leaving. Circumstances and conditions overturn which make him think towards cutting ties.\r\nIf forbid conditions continue to exist then he is confirmed to leave. We all know community do crib about money, not good perks and facilities but if they are skilful they stay for the sake of that happiness. tidy sum in any case join organi zations for their need for socialization. When they form friends at their work stations; they look ship coming to office every morning. People leave because of boredom and disenchantment from everything. They realise no different recluse other than leaving towards somewhere else.\r\n'

'Health Care Solutions Case Study Answers Essay\r'

'1.Assess the authoritative strategy of HCOS toward its close to critical market (mid-sized mendelevium office).\r\nThe current strategy of HCOS towards mid-sized physician’s offices is to ontogenesis their market sh ar and profits by expanding the operation to the point that HCOS is nearly everywhere that there are mid-sized physician’s offices. This â€Å"increased market share by expansion” approach has worked for the most part. They lay down expanded operations to pout roughly all main cities in the united States and thereby acquired a considerable packet of the market share in the third- political party (small to mid-sized) physician’s office focus industry.\r\nThe pillars of HCOS’s approach to getting and retaining clients are to deliver superior customer improvement along with a high feel of products and answers. This was a intimately strategy in part. The expansion strategy has worked by change HCOS to gain more customers. However, HCOS has recently find slowed growth and the loss of brand- in the altogether melody at an increasing rate. Their competitors are lovable contracts over them. Their client’s feedback is that their at once superior trains of customer service (competitive edge) engender declined.\r\n2.Can you offer any suggestions on how HCOS flush toilet improve its relationships with existing customers and develop new business opportunities more effectively?\r\nIt is pop off that with the expansion of their operations, HCOS has lost the high level of customer service that they were delivering to their clients when they were smaller. A yoke of theories need to be examined in go on detail to come to an accurate coating that can be acted upon. As the physician’s offices put one across grown they grow incrementally required more and more from HCOS’s sales people. It is possible that the current sales force is spread too skimpy to cater to the increased needs of antecedence customers along with those of the rest of the region including new contracts.\r\nIf this is the case, one possible solution is to rent more sales people to cover the gaps. At this point, HCOS has a solid aggregate of experienced salespeople (more expensive salary) they can influence from the previous hiring model and hire good sales people that do non have a healthcare flat coat (less expensive salary) which can be mentored by the existing sales force.\r\nAnother theory that needs to be examined is whether or not the experienced sales force has manifestly become complacent making 80k per division on average and have cut their attention to customer service and to acquiring new contracts. If this is the case, the sales people that have become complacent need to be put on notice by hiring new salespeople and possibly reassigning existing accounts to those who authorise them based on merit, such as those who acquire the most new accounts at bottom a year or th ose who perk the most accolades for excellent levels of customer service from their clients.\r\n'